April 16, 2017
I’ve spent the last year or so teaching temari ball stitching to beginners but have recently taken time out to think about new challenges and opportunities. New directions have developed out of having had the pleasure of meeting other temari stitches in my local area. I’d never have imagined it, but local lace makers are very proficient and experienced in stitching temari – a new source of inspiration, far more motivating than interacting with a virtual community of stitchers online with its intrinsic distance and indifference!
When I first started stitching Intermediate Level temari, I adopted the same approach I’d been using with Beginner temari: look at the pattern, visualise where threads are stitched and then jump in.
This approach didn’t work and proved to be very dispiriting.
Since then, I’ve realised there are two options available. The first involves computer technology and specifically software which allows the stitcher to plot stitches on a blank virtual ball. The process is slow, but the chief advantage is that you allow a machine to do the imagining instead of the mind.
I’ve hit upon a second option, which involves the “trial” stitching of an entire ball. The chief advantage is that a “rough” attempt at an intermediate ball can be knocked out in a relatively short period of time – one to three days working part-time. The downside is that it looks rough, is less than perfect and, unless it’s to be used later for teaching purposes, needs to be thrown away or stitched over. Yes, there is ‘wasted’ thread involved. But one can test colours more thoroughly and certainly assess spacing and numbers of threads required with much greater accuracy.
My source for my first two experiments has been Yukio Hisayama and Hiroko Takimoto’s book, Kii temari (Macaw, 1993, ISBN 4-8377-0933-3).
Test ball #1 – Kii temari #7, p.5 and p.44
I followed the recommended size of 36cm circumference, but after that I was on my own. The pattern inside the small squares is standard over-under interlocking, but certainly the stitching inside the hexagons is not standard over-under interlocking and, as shown by posts to the Temari Challenge Groups.io website, the hexagon interlocking requires more appreciation and understanding than I’m capable of.
What I did do, however, was use a standard over-under interlocking in both squares and hexagons. Standard interlocking inside the hexagons is used by the book’s authors in ball #4 on the same page 5, so the experience on my part wasn’t entirely wasted.
I abandoned the ball late in the piece mainly because the division lines were less than 1/32″ in accuracy. And frankly, if your division lines are 1/32″ out, one is are wasting one’s time stitching any “all-over” design and expecting perfection.
The good news is that I feel very confident about tackling ball #4 on page 5 of Kii temari!
Test ball #2 – Kii temari #3, p.8 and p,.32
Again, I followed the recommended size of 30cm circumference, but was left to my own devices after that. I had stitched a similar ball years ago.
I stuck with the same dark green mari, full thickness of DMC gold metallic thread for the C8 divisions, a pure optic white and a slightly darker red than Chinese Red.
What I’ve learned from an afternoon stitching this “trial” ball is as follows:
- the ball has to be divided accurately within 1/32″ accuracy, anything more than this is fatal;
- somehow or other the red triangles have to be stitched so they are parallel to all sides at all times;
- I have doubts about the 1/2 marking required for the initial red stitches because the authors stitch 6 strips of 4 rows each and I only managed three – either that, or the thread is pearl cotton 8 not 5.
- don’t interweave the strips of red in the ‘carnation petals’
- the tone of green going around the outside of each square is wrong (and obviously needs to be wider – probably eight rows wide).
I just may have solved the problem of my tackling Intermediate Level balls. It’s just a pity it’s taken me six or seven years to come this conclusion!
October 7, 2016
I took a 17cm-circumference styrofoam ball and prepared a mari 24cm-circumference with Simple 8 (S8) divisions on a dark green background.
I stitched the “basket” first in one hemisphere of the ball. It will be made up of nine rows of stitches in three shades of green. I will add the “flower” in the other hemisphere of the ball later on.
Photo 1. This shows the equator. Adding pins 1/3 up from the equator on all eight division lines, I added extra division lines between all the pins. If you like, you can alter the distance of the pins from the equator as follows: 1cm = four rows of stitching.
Photo 2. This is a shot of the “basket” hemisphere head-on. The orange pin is my starting point for my stitching; I move to the red pin, keeping at all times to the left of the division line. I continue the stitch around the ball till I end up at the orange pin where I started. Half the round is one side of the division line; the other half of the round is on the other side of the division line.
Photo 3. This shows the ‘basket’ hemisphere after stitching four rows.
Photo 4. This shows the ‘basket’ hemisphere after stitching nine rows.
My next step is to do the same stitching on the remaining four divisions, interleaving each stitch at the equator, so the points at the top of the basket will be overlapping.
October 5, 2016
I’ve paused momentarily in braiding the embroidery braids in Jacqui Carey’s book, Chinese Braid Embroidery, just to consolidate what I’ve been learning.
I’m finding the braids look better with the high tension that comes from the bobbins standing high up from the platform – that is, just at that point when extra thread has to be released. It goes without saying that for the first braids in Carey’s book, her advice about keeping the far bobbins as close as possible to the back uprights is excellent!
Braid JC2. I wasn’t happy with my first attempt at the purple-and-white chevrons, so I had another go. As with all braiding, I need to keep my eyes both on the bobbin movements as well as what’s happening at the braiding point.
Braid JC5. This is the green-and-white braid, reproducing one held in the British Museum. Perhaps it was the strong contrast between the very dark green and white, but (in pearl cotton 5) it has come out the best-looking braid so far. For some unknown reason, it does require ‘tweaking’ at the braiding point. As with the earlier braids in two colours, it’s very easy to mislay the bobbins and end up with a mistake, especially when working at speed; I’m getting used to “reverse braiding” and undoing any mistakes.
Braid JC1. I came across some very thin, very glossy silk-like synthetic which is two-ply. The braid ends up being 2mm wide. There appear to be inconsistencies in the way the ridges fall, but frankly I’d need a magnifying glass to analyse them; I think it all comes down to tweaking anything vaguely awry at the braiding point as soon as you detect a problem.
Importantly, this is my first attempt at joining threads as Miao braiders themselves do. With each succeeding knot and join, I got better. I need to refer to bobbin lace making for better joins. In Miao textiles, joins are disguised as part of the applique/couched embroidery process and, frankly, with such thin thread, joins are required at very short intervals. I’ve been used to warping bobbins “by hand” so far, but will upgrade to warping between two doorknobs several metres apart: the thinner the braid, the longer the thread needs to be. I wonder how long the silk threads are which Miao buy at their markets.
My aim, before too long, is to copy in all respects the tiny panel at Fig.99 in the book. I doubt it will be anything like the 8×4.5cm of the original, but I like the idea of (re-)creating a piece of Miao textile which shows the braid in context, among cross-stitch and folded silk-ribbon applique.
Photo 1. The 2ply synthetic, showing a near-empty bobbin ready for another piece of thread to be joined.
Photo 2. First attempts at braids JC1-4.
September 30, 2016
Today, braids JC3 and 4 from Jacqui Carey’s book, Chinese Braid Embroidery.
All are 2 metres in length in pearl cotton 5, one strand per bobbin, yielding a braid 5mm wide.
Note erratum page 67: The arrangement of colours for JC3 should be the starting bobbins 1,2, 7 and 8 are one colour and bobbins 3,4,5 and 6 of another colour. The surface design resembles the takuboku woodpecker braid in Japan, as featured in samurai armour.
JC4 resembles the kata-sasanami braid in Japan.
Left to right: JC1, JC2, JC3 and JC4.
September 29, 2016
Today, I worked braid JC2 from Jacqui Carey’s book, Chinese Braid Embroidery, creating a two-colour chevron braid; again in pearl cotton 5, one strand per bobbin, 2 metres in length, creating about 125cm/50″, about 5mm wide.
I decided to try attaching the thread to the bobbin using a Western bobbin lace-style slip knot. This worked extremely well, enabling me to quick-release thread almost with one hand. I noticed an improvement if I kept the bobbin thread about 3cm/1″ from the cuphook on the top; any lower down and you have to exaggerate the hand movements to keep out of the way of the cuphook; any higher and the thread and slip knot catch on the cuphook. I’m not intending to think about making my own bobbins until I’ve done all the braids in Jacqui Carey’s book.
Borrowing from the Japanese bobbin-and-stand tradition (the takadai in particular), I decided also to attach a cotton leader to the roller and secure the bobbin threads to that leader. This stopped the braid from slipping.
As I go, I’m imitating the photos of original Miao textiles she has published with each braid diagram, by keeping the colour schemes identical to the photos. This lends an air of authenticity to what I’m doing. Today’s was white and light purple.
September 28, 2016
A temari student of mine is currently working on stitching Complex 10 divisions, stitching on a pale blue mari. As a teaching aid, I developed this sequence of three balls, with the same design: a small Simple 10, a larger Complex 10 and also a 32-pole version.
September 28, 2016
Today, a repeat of JC 1, the first braid in Jacqui Carey’s book Chinese Braid Embroidery. I decided I was sufficiently used to the bobbin movements to tackle a monochromatic braid. To achieve a longer braid, I used 2 metres/35 inches of single-strand pearl cotton 5 on each bobbin. To maximise the braided length, I knotted each strand to the brass cuphook on the top of each bobbin. Towards the end of the braid, the knot came off the cuphook – of course, the Miao braiders simply tie on another length and keep braiding. The hand movements were very quick; what took up most time was winding on the threads. I kept wondering whether a slip knot, as used in bobbin lace, wouldn’t have been more efficient. I was happy with the length – 50 inches/127cm – and the width was the same as yesterday’s multicoloured version at 5mm.